Skip to content
HPR Logo
My Request
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Health Psychology Research Ltd.
    • Our Team
    • Our Goals
  • Questionnaires
    • Find a Questionnaire
    • Languages Available
    • My Request
    • Summary Guidelines
  • Linguistic Validation
  • News
  • Research
    • Current Research
    • Publications & Posters
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Health Psychology Research Ltd.
    • Our Team
    • Our Goals
  • Questionnaires
    • Find a Questionnaire
    • Languages Available
    • My Request
    • Summary Guidelines
  • Linguistic Validation
  • News
  • Research
    • Current Research
    • Publications & Posters
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us

Evaluation of the hypoglycaemia symptom rating questionnaire (HypoSRQ) and its relationship with hypoglycaemic episodes measured using continuous glucose monitoring.

Taylor MD, Han TS, Ward H, McBride J, Yap I and Bradley C
01/02/2013

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 15 (Suppl 1): A23-A24 Abstract O-65.
Oral presentation at 6th International Conference on Advanced Treatments & Technologies (ATTD): 27th February-2nd March 2013, Paris, France.

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hypoglycaemia Symptom Rating Questionnaire (HypoSRQ © C.Bradley: www.healthpsychologyresearch.com) and the relationships between reported hypoglycaemic symptoms and measured hypoglycaemia using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Patients and methods: Patients (53 men, 50 women), aged 18-86 years, with type 1 diabetes (n=65) for mean duration of 19.6 (SD=12.9) years and type 2 diabetes treated with insulin (n=38) for mean duration of 9.7 (SD=8.5) years, completed the HypoSRQ (recent-weeks version). Thirty patients used CGM (iPro2, Medtronic) for six days and completed the HypoSRQ (24-hour version) at the end of each day for seven days, the end of each week (7-day version), and the end of four weeks (recent-weeks version). Four patients used CGM for 28 days for within-person analyses.

Results: The HypoSRQ had a one-factor structure and excellent internal consistency (n=94, Cronbach’s α=0.90). There was high correspondence in recalled hypoglycaemic symptoms, bother ratings and hypoglycaemic episodes comparing the HypoSRQ daily versions with the weekly version, and the weekly versions with the recent-weeks version (r=0.84-0.97, p<0.001). HypoSRQ-reported hypoglycaemic episodes correlated significantly with CGM-measured hypoglycaemia in between-person (r=0.66, p<0.001) and within-person analyses (r=0.42-0.59, p<0.03). These relationships remained significant after adjustments for age, sex, treatment duration and type of diabetes.

Conclusions: The HypoSRQ has moderate to high sensitivity in detecting CGM-measured hypoglycaemia and its psychometric properties provide an attractive instrument for use in people with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Further cross-validation and use of the HypoSRQ in different centres and in non-insulin treated patients is recommended.

Link to publication
HPR Logo footer
  • About Us
  • Questionnaires
  • Website terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Cookie settings
  • About Us
  • Questionnaires
  • Website terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Cookie settings
Cyber Essentials logo
  • About Us
  • Questionnaires
  • Website terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Cookie settings
  • About Us
  • Questionnaires
  • Website terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Cookie settings

© 2026 Health Psychology Research Ltd. Company no. 4803452

We'd like to use analytics cookies to see how our website is used so we can improve it. They are only set if you accept. Cookie policy